Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer. Esofagectomía laparoscópica frente a abierta en el cáncer esofágico distal. Request PDF on ResearchGate | Esofagectomía transhiatal por vía abierta y vía laparoscópica para el cáncer de esófago: análisis de los. La esofagectomía transhiatal mínimamente invasiva, en algunos enfermos con acalasia, tiene todos los beneficios del mínimo acceso, y con el empleo de un.

Author: Dogore Nekree
Country: Belgium
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 28 May 2015
Pages: 436
PDF File Size: 8.5 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.54 Mb
ISBN: 128-1-58171-325-7
Downloads: 35431
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Doutilar

No statistical differences in mean survival and mean disease free survival were found after the cohorts were corrected for neoadjuvant therapy. No patient had unbearable pain. Thoracoscopy lasted minutes anastomosis was 50 minutes longlaparoscopy lasted minutes, and second laparoscopy lasted 20 minutes.

Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: Discussion To date both transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy are performed worldwide for distal esophageal or GE junction cancers.

Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. The mortality rate 5. Surg Gynecol Obstet ; Please review our privacy policy. Transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of esofagecomia esophagus.

Blunt dissection was preferred. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Several minimally invasive approaches have been described to reduce operative trauma, improve dissection of the esophagus and tumor, reducing morbidity.

However, they pointed out that in the study performed there were two cases of aspiration and both were fatal. Computed tomography and MRI showed a distal esophageal mass of 4cm in diameter. Br J Surg ; In this study, mortality and morbidity did not find statistically significant transhiatall that indicated an advantage over one another method.

Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: outcomes

Operative technique The laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy was described in an earlier publication by Scheepers et al. The ones that offer better results in the resolution of dysphagia present higher morbidity and mortality, and those with lower, increase the rate of relapse of the clinical aspects, with possible new interventions 2414 Patients were discharged when they were completely mobile and able to feed themselves orally.


In summary the patient is operated in supine position with neck extended with exposure of the right side. Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy with anterior transhiztal. Thoracoscopic lower esophageal myotomy. The results were compared esoffagectomia the results of the group of fifty consecutive patients with tumors at the same localization who underwent a conventional open transhiatal esophageal resection in the pre-laparoscopy period between January and December The abdominal part of the operation was totally laparoscopic and the cervical one was made the conventional way.

The only curative therapy remains surgery. The laparoscopic transhiatal approach used in this study showed important advantages over the open approach, including less operative blood loss, shorter ICU stay, and shorter hospital stay with the same oncological outcome.

In their experience of patients, median ICU stay was 1 day and the hospital stay was 7 days, with an operative mortality of 1.

Surgery of the upper esophageal sphincter open technique. To compare the results of minimally invasive laparoscopic esophagectomy EMIL vs. The leiomyoma was completely enucleated. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: The role of multimodality therapy for ressectable esophageal cancer.

Esofagectomía transhiatal videoasistida en la acalasia esofágica

Optimal management of chylothorax can decrease mortality. The comparative series of case-control studies by Perry et al.

However, there are no randomized studies to differentiate them in their results. This effect was only present for minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy as the case-control studies reporting on laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy had a small sample size.


The phrenoesophageal membrane was divided.

Esofagectomía transhiatal por SILS (acceso único) para cáncer

Forty-four patients with advanced megaesophagus groups 3 and 4 of the classification of Rezende 24 were eligible from to The future of esoffagectomia surgery. None of them had biliary lithiasis detected on total abdomen ultrasound.

An analysis of 60 cases. Adaptation of positive end expiratory pressure and an increase of minute volume of the mechanical ventilation could avoid this problem and consequent conversion in all patients From January through Decemberfifty consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopically assisted transhiatal esophageal resection in the VU university medical center were prospectively followed.

In spite of initial high percentage of respiratory complication after thoracoscopic esophageal resection 14, Ann Thorac Surg ; It is based on three options: All had epidemiological disease history and previous contact with triatomine Esofagectomix infestans. Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Surg Res ; Surgical treatment of advanced megaesophagus is controversial In the s, surgical diseases were impacted by videolaparoscopic access, reducing morbidity and favoring early recovery.

Another variable studied in this study was the pain score, whose results were better for the laparoscopic group, but with no esofagectmia difference. Ask a question to the author You must be logged in to ask a question to authors. Patients with previous upper abdominal surgery did not undergo a laparoscopic approach. Sixty-four with malignant neoplasm of esophagus.

Relation between human papillomavirus positivity and p16 expression in head and neck carcinomas-a tissue microarray study.